<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sexism?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.punditguy.com/sexism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.punditguy.com/sexism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 14:13:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Mister Snitch!</title>
		<link>http://www.punditguy.com/sexism/comment-page-1/#comment-1065</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Snitch!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 04:49:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditguy.com/wp/?p=1679#comment-1065</guid>
		<description>I see. &quot;Cronyism&quot; is an acceptible perception. &quot;Sexism&quot; is not. Because the President has feet of clay, and the online pundits don&#039;t.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see. &#8220;Cronyism&#8221; is an acceptible perception. &#8220;Sexism&#8221; is not. Because the President has feet of clay, and the online pundits don&#8217;t.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JunkYardBlog</title>
		<link>http://www.punditguy.com/sexism/comment-page-1/#comment-1066</link>
		<dc:creator>JunkYardBlog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 19:58:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditguy.com/wp/?p=1679#comment-1066</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;BAD FAITH ARGUMENTS&lt;/strong&gt;

I&#039;ve tried to remain neutral for the most part on the Miers nomination, all while professing dismay and disappointment that we wouldn&#039;t get the kind of stellar nominee the position deserves nor be a part of the ideological battle royale...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BAD FAITH ARGUMENTS</strong></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve tried to remain neutral for the most part on the Miers nomination, all while professing dismay and disappointment that we wouldn&#8217;t get the kind of stellar nominee the position deserves nor be a part of the ideological battle royale&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnny</title>
		<link>http://www.punditguy.com/sexism/comment-page-1/#comment-1064</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Oct 2005 17:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditguy.com/wp/?p=1679#comment-1064</guid>
		<description>I agree, it is all about cronyism and not sexism. And the bizarre direction this takes shows how the White House is falling apart -- if Laura (hurricane &quot;Corina&quot; or &quot;Katrina&quot;?) claims sexism, then she is accusing the righties of sexism.  Not so good for their attempts to be more inclusive.  The irony is marvelous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree, it is all about cronyism and not sexism. And the bizarre direction this takes shows how the White House is falling apart &#8212; if Laura (hurricane &#8220;Corina&#8221; or &#8220;Katrina&#8221;?) claims sexism, then she is accusing the righties of sexism.  Not so good for their attempts to be more inclusive.  The irony is marvelous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
