<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One Real Fact in Today&#8217;s Zogby Poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.punditguy.com/one-real-fact-in-todays-zogby-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.punditguy.com/one-real-fact-in-todays-zogby-poll/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 02:55:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: richard</title>
		<link>http://www.punditguy.com/one-real-fact-in-todays-zogby-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-1371</link>
		<dc:creator>richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Mar 2006 03:52:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditguy.com/wp/?p=2159#comment-1371</guid>
		<description>Do you think this poll was a liberal fabrication designed to obfuscate and confuse? Because a couple of years back the same polls showed high levels of support for the war in Iraq, and you didn&#039;t tell readers to disregard them as bogus back then. As a former journalist and pollster, I&#039;d have to conclude you are telling your readers to disregard this poll because it says stuff you don&#039;t want to hear and/or don&#039;t want to believe. That&#039;s fine. But you&#039;re only fooling yourself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think this poll was a liberal fabrication designed to obfuscate and confuse? Because a couple of years back the same polls showed high levels of support for the war in Iraq, and you didn&#8217;t tell readers to disregard them as bogus back then. As a former journalist and pollster, I&#8217;d have to conclude you are telling your readers to disregard this poll because it says stuff you don&#8217;t want to hear and/or don&#8217;t want to believe. That&#8217;s fine. But you&#8217;re only fooling yourself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.punditguy.com/one-real-fact-in-todays-zogby-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-1370</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditguy.com/wp/?p=2159#comment-1370</guid>
		<description>Gotcha!

You obviously haven&#039;t spent any time reading this blog. My sarcasm went right over your head.

My statement on the abilities of a segment of our armed services is as valid as the results of the poll itself.

Stick around, read me more, then come back to this and see if you &#039;get it&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotcha!</p>
<p>You obviously haven&#8217;t spent any time reading this blog. My sarcasm went right over your head.</p>
<p>My statement on the abilities of a segment of our armed services is as valid as the results of the poll itself.</p>
<p>Stick around, read me more, then come back to this and see if you &#8216;get it&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rod</title>
		<link>http://www.punditguy.com/one-real-fact-in-todays-zogby-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-1369</link>
		<dc:creator>rod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.punditguy.com/wp/?p=2159#comment-1369</guid>
		<description>Wow. Just ... wow.

First of all, way to Support Our Troops&#174;! Sure, you&#039;ll support &#039;em, right up to the point where they question your simplistic worldview, at which point you&#039;ll turn on &#039;em like a wet dog. Your loyalty to the men and women doing the actual fighting and dying in this war would be touching, were you not so - what&#039;s that word I&#039;m looking for? - oh, yeah: disloyal. Here&#039;s a suggestion. Why don&#039;t you go call some of these reservists and guardsmen &quot;wimps&quot; to their faces?

Second, it seems to have escaped your attention that a solid majority of Marines (almost six in ten) also support imminent withdrawal. Why don&#039;t you tell some of them that they&#039;re wimps? Just be sure to let me know when and where you plan to do such a thing, because I really want to watch what happens next.

Hey, while you&#039;re at it, why don&#039;t you go make fun of some of the soldiers who have returned from Iraq without limbs - you may feel free to limit this exercise to injured and disfigured reservists and guardsmen, if you would like - so that they, too, can know the depth of your support? I hear they really like being called &quot;cripples&quot; and &quot;gimps,&quot; especially by a brave and honorable patriot such as yourself.

Finally, re: your quote from John Hawkins - leaving aside for a moment the relative merit (or lack thereof) to his argument, you do realize that it has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with what you&#039;re on about, don&#039;t you? He&#039;s talking about political polls, and their usefulness in determining the pulse of the electorate. He&#039;s talking about the relationship of polls to voting. Voting has nothing to do with getting your ass shot up in Tikrit or Sadr City.

In short: What a giant douche you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Just &#8230; wow.</p>
<p>First of all, way to Support Our Troops&#174;! Sure, you&#8217;ll support &#8216;em, right up to the point where they question your simplistic worldview, at which point you&#8217;ll turn on &#8216;em like a wet dog. Your loyalty to the men and women doing the actual fighting and dying in this war would be touching, were you not so &#8211; what&#8217;s that word I&#8217;m looking for? &#8211; oh, yeah: disloyal. Here&#8217;s a suggestion. Why don&#8217;t you go call some of these reservists and guardsmen &#8220;wimps&#8221; to their faces?</p>
<p>Second, it seems to have escaped your attention that a solid majority of Marines (almost six in ten) also support imminent withdrawal. Why don&#8217;t you tell some of them that they&#8217;re wimps? Just be sure to let me know when and where you plan to do such a thing, because I really want to watch what happens next.</p>
<p>Hey, while you&#8217;re at it, why don&#8217;t you go make fun of some of the soldiers who have returned from Iraq without limbs &#8211; you may feel free to limit this exercise to injured and disfigured reservists and guardsmen, if you would like &#8211; so that they, too, can know the depth of your support? I hear they really like being called &#8220;cripples&#8221; and &#8220;gimps,&#8221; especially by a brave and honorable patriot such as yourself.</p>
<p>Finally, re: your quote from John Hawkins &#8211; leaving aside for a moment the relative merit (or lack thereof) to his argument, you do realize that it has absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with what you&#8217;re on about, don&#8217;t you? He&#8217;s talking about political polls, and their usefulness in determining the pulse of the electorate. He&#8217;s talking about the relationship of polls to voting. Voting has nothing to do with getting your ass shot up in Tikrit or Sadr City.</p>
<p>In short: What a giant douche you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
